Then in 2002 some bright spark decided to unleash another sequel onto the unsuspecting public. However regardless of this the third installment was a moderate success and actually was't that bad. However the makers didn't realise that a new child star and a different formula was not what the viewing public craved. The makers must have thought that Home Alone 3 was going to be as big a success. At this point Macaulay Culkin was one of the most sought after child actors in the business.However his success was short-lived and is now only known for his part in the Michael Jackson trial. The first 2 Home Alone films were very successful in the early 90s. Standing out 24 hrs in 10 degrees Fahrenheit is way cooler than watching this movie. I've seen some MST3K films and some are way more noble than this crap! It's a good thing I spent only 1.00 on a crappy dollar-store tape for this movie! I was seriously disappointed. There is even a shot of the houses at night done with a cheap home camcorder. It is also accompanied by atrociously bland dialogue, pitiful acting, hilariously bad sound effects, and the picture quality makes it look like it was filmed in the mid-1980's. They don't even do robberies anymore! It's now staged to the more dismal subject of child abduction. French Stewart does a horrid rendition of Harry and Marv. And most of all, MARV LOOKS LIKE HARRY FROM THE OTHER 2 FILMS! He even has a stupid hooker wife named Vera. ![]() He disrespects the butler, who is an infinitely better actor than the others in this film. Kevin is a little brat now, just leeching off Natalie and his dad, who separated from his nice mom for a sybaritic, selfish twad. Instead, they have to make this movie stupid, campy, and bland. I thought this movie was going to be inventive, un-recycled and have new punch lines. Reviewed by ENDING-MAN 1 / 10 This movie sucks!
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |